explicature

Name : Iffatul lailiyah (04310122)
: Wahid Nugroho (05320 )
: Moh. Jufri (05320121)
: M. Agung Hidayatullah (05320080)

Target Kejagung, 2025 Indonesia bebas korupsi.
Sebab, uang Negara sudah habis. (Mr. Pecut, Jawa Pos: 5 Desember 2008)

Implicatures

- Indonesia will be free from corruption in 2025

- The only target is eradicating corruption

- How about in 2025 -…?

- the government budgets run out

In this case, we believe that the statement above is classified as generalized implicature, because the term of corruption commonly happens in society, even the societies do not learn specifically about corruption itself. So, without context, they will easily understand what the case means.
But, why does Mr Pecut give that comment? Because if we wait until 2025, it will take a long term to solve, and, the government budgets will run out by itself. As matter of fact, the government overcomes this matter as soon as possible. It does not need wait for 17 years later.
Besides, this utterance hedges maxim of relation/relevance. It relates the effort of corruption eradication and the target of Kejagung. It also hedges maxim because Mr Pecut quotes what Kejagung says.

KPK buka informasi kekayaan pejabat.
Pendapatan tambahan sih tetap tertutup. (Redaksi Republika, 5 Desember 2008)

Implicatures

- the additional incomes remain closed

- What about non-government authority?

The utterance above is named as particularized implicature, for not all the readers know about the information of the government wealth. We should have enough knowledge about the aspects of the government wealth, whether it is about their moneys, capitals, investments, houses, cars, or others. In understanding this utterance, also, they should know the context first.
The significance of this case also influences the readers to try to understand this utterance (without knowing the context first), even some of us never thought about others' wealth.
Then, this utterance obeys the maxim i.e. maxim of quantity, since we do not find the hints which can break that maxim whether it is flouting or hedging. Also this utterance is as informative since the redactors want to give information to the readers about the clearing of information of government properties.

Conclusion
Based on the cases/examples above, Jawa Pos tends to use generalized implicature. It is proven with other examples we find in its articles. While Republika likes using particularized implicature. Most of the cases performed are difficult to understand if we do not know the contexts.
Besides, after catching the comments of each utterance, Jawa Pos is more ironic and exaggerated than Republika in making comments. Furthermore, the first one often gives clues to be easily understood by the readers rather than the second one.

remorse

Remorse
M.Jufri*

Brain gets free
Heart cries like raining
No words can be born
Except, why and why

Soul, like number “One”
Life as if waited for doomsday
Extremely, not being composed
O……!!!! remorseful men!!

In life no having target
A small angel emerges
While whispering.

“O……fettered soul!!
Leave away your remorse blanket
Weak up from worry and fear!”

Beg to him
A universe creator.

The only him has
And definite, he will answer it.


He is English Department, seventh semester. Now he is a musyrif of Averous dormitory.

sunday eveneng

Habib Mustofa (04310098)
Ana Laili Rahmah (05320082)
Moh. Jufri (05320121)
Wahyunita (05320122)


Sunday evening, 9th of November 2008. 05.45 PM
MAGHRIB PRAYER IN CONGREGATION
Ziad : (Iqomah) Allahu Akbar…Allahu Akbar… till the end.
Ayo jadi imam pak!
Hanif : Maaf, aku lagi sakit. Gak bisa (Sambil berbaring di atas kasur)
Jufri : Saya kira kalau hanya kamu yang pergi ke masjid untuk sholat
jama’ah magrib masih muat kok.
Sofyan : Iya…jangankan dia, semua mahasantri Mabna Ibnu Rusydi
bahkan semua ma’had cowok, masjidnya masih muat kok.
Ziad : Iyo iyo! aku ngerti. (langsung pergi ke masjid untuk sholat
jama’ah maghrib)
According to Dell Hymes’ Theory
S : 9th room of Ibnu Rusydi’s first floor is the setting of the story in which the conversation is occurred. They have informal conversation because they are roommate.
P : The participants are Ziad, Hanif, Jufri, and Sofyan.
E : Ziad invited Hanif to be a leader of Magrib prayer in congregation in their room but Hanif refused Ziad’s command.
A : The conversation is begun with Adzan which is followed by zikir. In the middle of zikir, Ziad directly said iqomah till the end. Then, Ziad invited Hanif to be a leader of Magrib prayer in congregation. Unfortunately, Hanif refused Ziad’s command, Hanif was getting sick. Sofyan and Jufri said to Ziad that the mosque was still enough just for Ziad. And finally, they went to the mosque together for Magrib prayer in congregation except Hanif. He still laid on the bed.
K : They have relaxed conversation because it occurred in informal situation. In addition, they are roommate. So, it is impossible for them to have formal conversation.
I : The conversation is in slang language with Madurese, Sumatra, Bali, and Javanese dialect and not too much grammatically forms.
N : The norms in Indonesian country. Slang language only used by teenagers especially in informal situation.
G : The genre of this conversation is a daily conversation which tells about our daily activity.
The classification of Illocutionary acts based on John Searle’s Theory
1. Assertives : “Maaf, aku sakit. Gak bisa”
2. Directives : “Ayo jadi imam pak!”
“Saya kira kalau hanya kamu yang pergi ke masjid untuk sholat
jama’ah magrib masih muat kok”.
“Iya…jangankan dia, semua mahasantri Mabna Ibnu Rusydi
bahkan semua ma’had cowok, masjidnya masih muat kok.”
‘Iqomah’
Determining the Illocutionary Force Indicating Devices (IFID).
(Iqomah) Allahu Akbar…Allahu Akbar… till the end.
This utterance indicates the IFIDs because when Ziad pronounced this utterance, he used serious voice with low intonation. This utterance also used the directive mood because the utterance is (intended as) a directive illocutionary act (an order, a request, etc.)
“Maaf, aku sakit. Gak bisa”
This utterance indicates the IFIDs because Hanif refused to Ziad command indirectly and Hanif used relaxed voice with low intonation. This utterance also used the assertive mood because the utterance is to commit the speaker to the truth of the expressed proposition.
“Ayo jadi imam pak!”
This utterance indicates the IFIDs since Ziad ordered to Hanif to be a leader of Maghrib prayer in congregation. This utterance also used the directive mood because the utterance is (intended as) a directive illocutionary act (an order, a request, etc.)
“Saya kira kalau hanya kamu yang pergi ke masjid untuk sholat jama’ah magrib masih muat kok.”
This utterance indicates the IFIDs because when Jufri produced this utterance, he used serious voice with little high intonation. This utterance also used the directive mood because the utterance is (intended as) a directive illocutionary act (an order, a request, etc.)
“Iya…jangankan dia, semua mahasantri Mabna Ibnu Rusydi bahkan semua ma’had cowok, masjidnya masih muat kok.”
This utterance indicates the IFIDs because when Sofyan produced this utterance, he used serious voice with high intonation. This utterance also used the directive mood because the utterance is (intended as) a directive illocutionary act (an order, a request, etc.)
“Iyo iyo! aku ngerti.”
This utterance indicates the IFIDs because this utterance used the punctuation.